Questions about the AI Act?
We'll guide you safely through the new regulations.
Inquire without obligationFree & non-binding.
LEGAL UNCERTAINTY
Germany Misses AI Act Deadline:
No Supervisory Authority Designated
The EU deadline for designating national supervisory authorities for the AI Act expired on August 2, 2025. Germany has missed this deadline – there is still no official point of contact for companies. This creates significant legal uncertainty.

1. What Happened: Germany's Failure in Detail
The EU AI Regulation (AI Act) requires all member states to designate national market surveillance authorities by August 2, 2025. These authorities are crucial for monitoring compliance with the new rules. Germany has not met this important deadline.
Legislative Process Stalled
A national implementation law, the so-called AI Market Surveillance Act (KIMÜG), is in progress but has not yet been passed. The process was delayed, among other things, by the early federal election in February 2025.
Sharp Criticism from Experts
Data protection officers and consumer protection associations sharply criticize the federal government for the delay. They warn of a control gap and missing contact points for companies and consumers.
2. Voices of Criticism: Authorities & Associations Sound the Alarm
Thomas Fuchs, Hamburg's Data Protection Commissioner, puts the problem in a nutshell: 'Due to the delay, companies and authorities now lack their binding contact point for questions about the AI Regulation. This is also a disadvantage for Germany as an AI innovation hub.'
The Federation of German Consumer Organizations (vzbv) also urges haste. Lina Ehrig warns of the risks for consumers when there is no oversight of rights compliance.
3. What This Means for Companies: These Obligations Apply Anyway
The missing supervisory authority creates a climate of uncertainty but does not exempt companies from their obligations. The following AI Act requirements must already be implemented:
Risk Assessment for AI Systems
Companies must classify and assess the AI systems they use, especially high-risk systems.
Documentation Requirements
Technical documentation and compliance evidence must be prepared and maintained.
Competence Requirement under Art. 4
All relevant employees must be trained in handling AI systems and their regulation.
Violations can result in severe fines of up to 35 million euros or 7% of global annual turnover.
4. Your Roadmap to Compliance: Recommendations for Action
To minimize legal risks, companies should act now:
Clarify Internal Responsibilities
Designate one or more people responsible for AI compliance in your company.
Conduct Risk Classification
Analyze and classify all AI systems in the company according to AI Act criteria.
Train Employees
Fulfill the competence requirement under Art. 4 through targeted training, even without national guidelines.
Start Documentation
Begin immediately with documenting all technical, organizational, and legal aspects of your AI systems.
Conclusion
Germany is lagging behind in implementing the AI Act – but this does not exempt companies from their compliance obligations. Those who act proactively now reduce risks and will be prepared once national supervisory authorities begin their work.
Read Also
When Does What Apply? The Complete AI Regulation Timeline
All deadlines, dates, and transitional provisions of the EU AI Regulation in an interactive timeline.
Read articleEU AI Act: Commission Publishes Template for AI Training Data
The EU Commission has published an official template for documenting training data. What this means for providers.
Read articleDid you like this article?
Let us know and join the discussion!
Kommentare
Noch keine Kommentare
Bitte melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar zu schreiben.